|
Prevention of Animal Disease Using Genetically Engineered Vaccines
By James A. Weber,
Assistant Professor of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of
Maine
SUMMARY
Genetic engineering has been
used to make new, highly effective types of vaccines to protect animals
or humans from disease. The approach is to use molecular techniques to
"disarm" the pathogen, or to express single proteins of the pathogen in
a harmless bacterium or the vaccinated animal itself. These strategies
elicit a strong immune response against the pathogen without exposure to
the disease-causing organism.
Vaccines are among the most
cost-effective weapons in the fight against infectious diseases of
animals. By mimicking a disease-causing organism (pathogen) in the body
without causing signs of disease, an effective vaccine stimulates the
immune system to protect against the disease, often for years after
vaccination. Efficacy and safety are the primary considerations in the
design of a new vaccine. Killed vaccines have historically been
considered as the safest vaccination option available, since they do not
replicate in the body. Unfortunately, this characteristic also results
in relatively weak immunity to disease. Since most killed vaccines are
crude preparations, they sometimes cause unwanted inflammation at the
injection site.
In comparison, vaccines
composed of active organisms that can replicate in the body elicit a
more widespread and long lasting immune response than killed vaccines,
and produce a stronger and a longer-lasting immunity. However, their
ability to cause disease must be reduced to a safe level by a process
known as "attenuation." Until the advent of molecular biology
techniques, pathogenic organisms were attenuated by culturing them under
unusual conditions. For example, a virus that normally causes disease in
mammals would be grown in chicken cells at cool temperatures. Growth
under these conditions results in the randomly mutated viruses that have
adapted to the artificial conditions but lost the ability to cause
disease in the original host. Attenuated live vaccines, because they
replicate in the body, elicit a more vigorous and long-lasting immune
response than inactivated vaccines. But attenuated vaccines carry the
potential risk that the mutation which reduced their ability to cause
disease might be reversed by another mutation after injection.
With the advent of molecular
techniques, genetically modified organisms have been produced that
stimulate strong immunity with few of the risks of earlier vaccines. At
present, several different classes of genetically modified vaccines are
either in testing or already on the market.
The first approach
stimulates an immune response using only a single protein or protein
fragment from a pathogen synthesized in genetically engineered cells. An
example of this type of vaccine was developed against the bacteria that
causes Lyme disease. Molecular techniques were used to specifically
amplify the synthesis of a specific bacterial surface protein that
stimulates a strong immune response, and the purified single recombinant
protein was used an effective vaccine protecting against Lyme disease.
A second type approach is to
use genetic engineering to create a "live attenuated vaccine" by
specific deletion of genetic information. Removal of this information
renders the disease-causing organism harmless by taking away the genes
coding for those proteins necessary to cause disease, while preserving
the genes for proteins that stimulate the immune system. Because a
known, large segment of the pathogen is removed through molecular
biology procedures, these vaccines offer the promise of vigorous immune
responses with a greatly decreased risk of reverse mutation to a
disease-causing organism in comparison to attenuated vaccines.
A third type of
genetically-engineered vaccine can be produced by inserting
immune-inducing genes from a pathogenic organism into a vector that is
not capable of causing disease in the vaccinated animal. For example, a
harmless bacterium can be given the genetic information to make a
surface protein of a pathogen. Once inoculated into the host, this
bacterium will stimulate an immune response against both its own
proteins and the surface protein of the disease-causing organism. This
approach has great potential as a vaccine because it stimulates
cell-mediated as well as humoral (antibody-producing) immunity. Many
viral pathogens avoid the humoral immune system by hiding in cells, and
can only be destroyed by cell-mediated immune responses. In addition,
these types of genetically-engineered vaccines can be administered
orally if a bacterium is chosen that can enter the body through the
digestive tract. Most traditional vaccines must be injected directly
into tissues to elicit an immune response.
A fourth type of vaccination
approach is to inject a defined segment of DNA into a patient or an
animal. The DNA is chosen to code for one specific antigenic protein
from a pathogen. The protein made is chosen to elicit an immune response
but not to cause disease. Such "DNA-based vaccines" are similar in
principle to the third approach, but rely entirely on the animal’s cells
to take up the injected DNA and make the foreign protein. The DNA is
incapable of copying itself and thus cannot inadvertently "infect"
unvaccinated animals. Early trials with naked DNA vaccines in farm
animals have resulted in both humoral and cell-mediated immunity, and it
appears that the immune stimulation from one vaccination can persist for
months. Initial concerns that the foreign DNA may become incorporated
into the host’s chromosomes have not been demonstrated, although the
possibility has slowed commercial application.
Most new vaccine development
is currently limited to a small number of international pharmaceutical
companies. Genetically engineered vaccines offer so many advantages over
traditional vaccines that they will gradually replace many currently
available vaccines in the next few years. Animals vaccinated with the
latter type of genetically-engineered vaccines would be considered
transgenic.
For further information,
contact:
James A. Weber, Assistant professor
Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, University of Maine
Phone: 581-2774 or E-mail:
jweber@umext.maine.edu
|