|
Potato
- Grain Study (2001)
John Jemison and Matt Williams
Background
The overall purpose of this study is to examine ways to protect soils
from erosion and to examine cost effective ways to build soil organic matter. This study is actually two studies combined in one field plot: a volunteer barley regrowth trial and a potato mulch study. Potato followed by barley is the most common 1:1 rotation for potato
growers in Maine. When barley
is harvested, some amount of barley seed falls back on the soil surface and will
likely germinate and grow prior to frost. We are interested in learning how much we can influence volunteer barley
regrowth before freezing. Can we
add nitrogen fertilizer to boost growth and significantly influence the amount
of biomass being returned to the soil?
The second part of the study examines a different way to increase soil
organic matter. With the multiple soil disturbances during the production year and the
minimal amount of biomass that is returned to the soil, potato production over
time will lower soil organic matter. This makes the plants more susceptible to water stress, disease, and potentially
lower yields. We have explored many
ways to add carbon to these production systems to reduce this potential problem. In this project, we are evaluating paper mill and compost mulches applied
at last hilling to see the effect on potato growth and yield. These composts may help hold water and reduce weed growth in potatoes.
Study Objectives
Methods
A randomized complete block experiment with six replications was
established during the summer of 2001. “Robust” barley was planted on 8 May 2001 at a rate of 120 lbs/ac. “Yukon Gold” potatoes were planted on the same day next to barley in
strips. The size of each major
block was 200 feet long; the potato plots were 11.3 feet wide and the barley
plots were 8 feet wide. We applied
80 lb/ac N, 40 P205 and 60 K20 at planting in
the barley trial. Barley was
sprayed with 2,4-D at 1 pt/ac in June.
In the barley study, no treatments were applied until after harvest (13 August
2001). Following harvest, each
major blocks was split into five subplots. Five rates of N (0 – 40 lb N/ac in 10 lb increments) were hand applied
over the barley stubble on August 16.
In the potato study, compost and papermill sludge was hand applied at 7 and 15
dry tons/ac on July 5, 2001. A
check plot was left to assess the impact of the cover materials.
Upon delivery to the field site, paper fiber and compost was tested to
have a dry matter content of 30 and 46% respectively. We tested soil water content twice, at two week intervals, by taking
gravimetric water to a depth of 6 inches. Soil temperature was collected twice using a standard soil thermometer. We tested N status using a hand-held chlorophyll meter. Potatoes were harvested by hand on 23 August 2001.
Potatoes were graded and 20 marketable potatoes were rated for quality by
estimating percent surface area covered by common scab and rhizoctonia.
Results -- Potatoes
Compost and paper fiber mulch had no significant impact on soil
moisture, temperature, yield or quality of potatoes in 2001. Soil moisture was found to be somewhat higher due to the presence of compost and
paper fiber. A trend toward higher soil moistures was found with the higher rates of
each particularly after the last measurement, but this difference was not
significant (Table 1). Temperature
was not significantly affected by the presence of mulch or compost in this study
as well.
Table 1.
Soil moisture and temperatures after application of mulch materials
|
Treatment |
Soil Moisture-7/14 |
Soil Temp – 7/14 |
Soil Moisture-7/28 |
Soil Temp –
7/28
|
|
Check |
0.164 |
19.85 |
0.135 |
19.6 |
|
Compost 7.5 |
0.156 |
19.8 |
0.154 |
19.6 |
|
Compost 15 |
0.166 |
20.07 |
0.171 |
19.6 |
|
Paper Fiber 7.5 |
0.173 |
19.7 |
0.153 |
19.8 |
|
Paper Fiber 15 |
0.161 |
19.6 |
0.143 |
19.7 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
Overall, potato yield was lower than average due to drought (Table 2). While tuber size was fairly good, tuber number was quite low. Tuber number was set by the plant prior to application of compost or
paper fiber. Yield was decreased by
the presence of compost and paper fiber at the highest rate by 13 and 15 cwt/ac,
respectively. This may have been due to the paper fiber and compost tying
up what little rain fell on the plots after the application of compost. While the soil moistures were not different due to the presence of
mulches, they may have had a more subtle impact on soil water relations than our
method of soil moisture analysis allowed us to detect. Leaf chlorophyll data indicate very little tie up of nitrogen from the
presence of the mulch.
Table 2.
Yield and quality of potatoes harvest 8/23/01.
|
Treatment |
Total
Yield
|
Marketable
Yield
|
Chlorophyll
(SPAD units)
|
Scab
(% surf. area)
|
Rhizoctonia
(% surf, area)
|
|
Check |
183.6 |
163.1 |
38.4 |
0.44 |
1.23 |
|
Compost 7.5 |
180.9 |
160.6 |
37.2 |
0.375 |
1.35 |
|
Compost 15 |
170.4 |
147.8 |
38.3 |
0.45 |
1.77 |
|
Paper Fiber 7.5 |
182.6 |
165.4 |
37.7 |
0.28 |
1.48 |
|
Paper Fiber 15 |
169.3 |
150.6 |
37.6 |
0.2 |
0.50 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
0.72 |
Lastly, potato quality was not hurt by the presence of mulch and fiber
(Table 2). While there was some scab and rhizoctonia on the potatoes, it was not
sufficient to hurt overall potato quality.
Conclusions
To date, there is no apparent beneficial or detrimental effect on the
presence of compost or paper fiber residual mulches applied to the soil surface
following the second and final hilling operation.
If data from past trials holds true here, the benefit may be found when potatoes
are planted where the compost and fiber will be tilled in – this being in the
2003 growing season.
Thus, what we find from this work is that applying paper fiber and
compost mulches after last hilling may be a useful time to apply the materials
(due to work load) and it doesn’t significantly hurt potato production.
Results -- Barley
To date, we have found some scattered barley regrowth in the harvested
barley plots. However, there are no discernable trends as yet. |